SentenceCalc

Wiretapping and Eavesdropping Sentence Calculator

This page covers cases where a person wiretapped, eavesdropped or disclosed private or protected information. Federal sentences for wiretapping and eavesdropping are calculated under §2H3.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines, which sets a starting offense level from 6 to 9 depending on the kind of offense, then adds levels for the facts of the case. At the first starting point in the table below (level 9) alone, someone with no criminal history points who pleads guilty scores 0–6 months under the guidelines.

Verified Checked against the manual text in at least five AI-assisted review rounds. Not yet reviewed by an attorney. Guidelines Manual effective November 1, 2025Updated October 4, 2026

Calculate it

Change any answer and the sentence updates. Nothing you enter leaves this page.

 See the math

Starting level and typical ranges

These ranges use the starting level alone, before any of the facts listed below, for someone with no criminal record unless the column says otherwise. Most real cases add levels.

Starting pointLevelTrialGuilty pleaPlea + zero-pointCategory IV, plea
More than one year, or six months or less94–10 months0–6 months0–6 months8–14 months
One year or less, but more than six months60–6 months0–6 months0–6 months2–8 months

What changes the sentence

Each of these facts moves the offense level under §2H3.1. Adjustments that apply to every offense, such as role in the offense, obstruction, a guilty plea and criminal history, come after these.

FactEffectRule
Was the purpose commercial advantage or economic gain, or is the conviction under 18 U.S.C. §1039(d) or (e): Yes, the purpose was direct or indirect commercial advantage or economic gain+3§2H3.1(b)(1)
Was the purpose commercial advantage or economic gain, or is the conviction under 18 U.S.C. §1039(d) or (e): Yes, convicted under 18 U.S.C. §1039(d) or (e)+3§2H3.1(b)(1)
Is the conviction under 18 U.S.C. §119: Yes+8§2H3.1(b)(2)
Is the conviction under 18 U.S.C. §119: Yes, and a computer or online service was used to make the information publicly available+10§2H3.1(b)(2)

Important details

  • If the purpose of the offense was to help commit another crime, the guideline for an attempt to commit that other crime applies if it gives a higher level (§2H3.1(c)(1)).
  • If the offense involved intercepting satellite cable transmissions for commercial advantage or private financial gain, including avoiding fees, the copyright infringement guideline (§2B5.3) applies instead (§2H3.1, note 1).
  • The calculator does not apply mandatory minimum sentences set by statute for this offense. If the statute of conviction requires one and it is higher than the range shown, the minimum controls; check the statute or ask a lawyer.

Frequently asked questions

What is the base offense level for wiretapping and eavesdropping?

The guideline for wiretapping and eavesdropping is §2H3.1 of the federal Sentencing Guidelines. Before any adjustments, its starting level depends on the facts: from level 6 to level 9. The table on this page lists each starting point.

What is the guideline range for wiretapping and eavesdropping with no criminal history points and a guilty plea?

Using the first starting point in the table on this page (level 9) alone, a person with no criminal history points who pleads guilty scores 0–6 months, including the 2-level zero-point reduction. The facts listed under “What changes the sentence” can add levels, and the judge can sentence outside the range.

Is probation possible for wiretapping and eavesdropping?

The guidelines allow it at the first starting point in the table: with a guilty plea and the zero-point reduction the range begins at 0 months (Zone A), so prison is not required, unless the offense is a Class A or B felony or the statute rules probation out (§5B1.1(b)). Added facts can raise the range out of Zone A.

Is the calculator accurate for wiretapping and eavesdropping?

It follows §2H3.1 of the Guidelines Manual effective November 1, 2025. It passed 6 review rounds, each comparing every number, rule and label with the manual text, and its last round found nothing to correct. Those reviews were done with AI tools, not by lawyers, and it has not yet been reviewed by an attorney, so mistakes are possible. The guidelines are advisory, and a lawyer who knows the case can tell you what actually applies.